中国城市规划管理听证会制度研究

上海交通大学硕士学位论文中国城市规划管理听证会制度研究姓名：袁贝丽申请学位级别：硕士专业：行政管理指导教师：王郁20060201STUDYONCHINAADMINISTRATIVEHEARINGINCITYPLANNINGAMDMANAGEMENTABSTRACTInthecourseofcityplanningandmanagement,thereoccurredalotofproblemswhichnotonlymakegovernmentcontrolevenmoredifficult,legbehindthepacesofcityplanningdevelopment,butalsoimpactthesatisfactionofcitizenstothegovernmentdecisions.Ascityplanningisaprofessionthatservestheoverallandpublicofthecity,inordertorealizeawholesetofcomprehensivelongtermgoalsofsociety,economy,andenvironment,itaswelloffersstrategiesofcityspacedevelopmentinthefuture.Therefore,itdirectlyreflectsthewelfareandlivingconditionsofthepeople.Itisoutofquestionthesignificanceoftheintroducingofadministrativehearinginthisregard.WiththedevelopmentofadministrativehearingincityplanningandmanagementinChina,theprocessofgovernmentadministrationandcityplanningwillthenbeimproved.Thisthesisisdividedintofiveparts.PartIembarksontheconceptofadministrativehearing,fromtheformationofwesternhearingsystemsandtheirrespectivelegalframes,meanwhileelaboratestheirsignificanceongovernmentdecision.PartIIdelvesintotheimportanceoftheintroductionofadministrativehearingtoChinacityplanningandmanagement,bymeansofinducingtheproblemsfacingourcityplanningandmanagement,andtherelativefunctionsthathearingboaststosolvethem.ItisraisedinthisPartthathearingcannotofferthegeneralpublictheapproachestoparticipatingincityplanningandmanagement,cultivatetheircommonsenseandprofessionalskillsforthecityplanningpublicparticipatingsystem,butaswellpositionthegeneralpublictherepresentativesofsocialbenefits,whichconformstheeventualgoalofcityplanningandmanagement.PartIIIandPartIVononehandilluminatetheweaknessanddeficienciesintheimplementationcourseofcityplanningandmanagementinourcountryviacaseanalysesandprojectstudies,ontheotherhandillustratesomedeliverablesandstrongpointsconcludedfromadministrativehearingsystemcarriedoutincityplanningandmanagementoutsideChina.Mirroredthestrengthandexperienceofcomparativelyimprovedcityplanningandmanagementsystemabroad,accordingtothestatusquoofcityplanningandmanagementinourcountry,PartVhasofferedsomepracticalpropositionssuitableforChinaforitsfuturedevelopmentofadministrativehearingincityplanningandmanagement.KEYWORDS:administrativehearing,legislativehearing,publicparticipating,administrativedecisiondemocratization200621420062142006214311.1901215“”1,2judicialhearing,,“”legislativehearing3D•199312002419219973441996“”“”199851“”1999993198915351.2“”454198410951995382620“”1.320707RichardBurt19741947-1971JeanMater1984“”“”“”123182392“”“”“”“”2“”“”10,21:,2003:,,,6,,,,,,2.12.1.1,49%2005422.112.621620031113114065.3“”“”3.705“”12,,,,,,,,,2.1.21320057305513.53.63.73.83.944.14.24.30%10%20%30%40%50%60%730142.1.315“”“”—“”730020406080100120162.1.4“”“”17,,,,,,,;,2.231200411“2835”18“”232.2.11“”192003“”220,32021“”“”7“”7-222.2.21,,,,;,,30,3000,,,80%1998-20026587.7%7.7%4.6%90%223205518324;20-30501525263“”3.11990“”6199619982000200471,,27“”1996101020003“”2000“”1997200120012002911“”2002“28”21“”2003“”2004200421200431200451200020042439382004111030029“”20056442002717203.23.2.120051123“”20021998308162321241.51.319(19)1.51.512365“”“”“”“”3165“”323.2.2“”20011112320037“”333.33.3.1“”“”343.3.22110107103.3.33520054134134127313()3.3.420023620003“”3.3.5“”2001372002717203.3.6105933844.1-1909190919651966TheFutureofDevelopmentPlans1968(planninginspector),(),,,,,6,,,,,28,,,-1(1996)39,,28.(6,,.628,2840,,,,,()“”“”()6()628820604.2-81996115`411919181968601968(1)(2)48(3)1968(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)()(6)(7)(8)()1000031099199310422121722424351819585661291939196419735.1,,.,,,,.,,:,,;,,,;44,,.,,.3352626455.2()23“”“”200146“23”23“23”10“”“23‘'”1123“”200172323122323102001://“”“”,,,,,,,,.,,(2002)“”“”“”“”“”——“”“”“”50“”60(Davidoff)“”135113.Davidoff200052[1]()19995[2]20042[3]20023[4]20042[5]1987[6]2003[7]1995[8][]·1986[9]2003[10]·—1997[11]—20021[12]WilliamJ.Keefe,MorrisS.Ogul,TheAmericanLegislativeProcess,Prentice-Hall1985[13]20001[14]19963[15]2003[16]—2004[17]2003[18]20033[19]20035[20]2004[21]2002453[22]1999[23]20024[24]·W··F·――M2002[25]WallaceSSayre,HerbertKaufmanGoverningNewYorkCityPoliticsintheMetropolisW·W·Norton&Company·inc·NewYork196554245520062中国城市规划管理听证会制度研究作者：袁贝丽学位授予单位：上海交通大学相似文献(5条)1.期刊论文乔新生立法听证会没有完成历史使命-决策2005,(10)9月27日,由全国人民代表大会法律委员会、财经委员会和全国人大常务委员会法制工作委员会举行的个人所得税法修改听证会圆满落幕,中国立法听证会制度在制定法律的过程中发挥了重要的作用.2.学位论文袁俊锋当代中国地方立法公众参与机制研究2010随着我国公众的民主权利意识和法治意识的逐渐提高，公众参与政治的要求越来越强烈，并且由于社会利益分化严重，社会矛盾错综复杂，这使得我国社会的各个方面都需要公众的积极参与，同时我国的改革也进入了深水区，涉及到方方面面的利益调整，特别是涉及到既得利益者的利益调整，于是公众的积极参与和创造性已成为当前改革开放的基本动力。没有公众的各方面的积极参与，我国各个方面的改革也很难取得合法性，我国这样一个大国的改革和建设也就很难取得成功。@@本文从人民主权理论、参与民主理论、治理理论和新公共管理理论出发，分析了我国公众参与地方立法的理论基础。本文还分析了我国法律中公众参与地方立法的规范性依据。我国公众参与地方立法取得了比较大的成就，创造了多种参与方式和途径，比如立法座谈会、全民讨论、书面征求意见、论证会、立法听证会、来信来访和来电、网络参与和列席立法会议。特别是立法听证会制度的建立，使公众有了更多的直接参与地方立法以及与立法工作者直接沟通的机会。但是我国公众参与地方立法依然存在很大不足，表现在地方立法机关主导性过强、公众参与地方立法的随意性较大，公众参与大都是无序参与、公众参与地方立法的积极性和主动性不高、我国公众参与地方立法的程度和意识不足和公众参与渠道比较单一，其主要原因主要有政治民主制度的不完善、社会经济发展条件的制约、