专业领域中行政解释的司法审查_以工伤行政为例

X,,,,,,,,,,,,(),,,,;,,,,,,,,621X,(20032007)()(20032007):(123),20032005,20042007,31,2004,2004,2003,(2003);2004,(2004);2005,(2005)(2009)(2009),,,,,,,,(),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,(),;,,,,,,,,,,,,,721SidneyA1Shapiro,ResponsestoOccupationalDisease:TheRoleofMarkets,Regulation,andInformation,72Geo1L1J1(2000),p112311(ChevronU1S1A1,Inc1v1NaturalResourcesDefenseCouncil,Inc,467U1S1837(1984),;,,:,20066;:,1,2008;,[]:,,2,2004;[]R:?,,2,2003,,41,,,,,,,,,2003923:,,,,,(),,,,,,,lu,,,,,,:1,;;;((20042007)(20042007))82120096lu:(2006),2007,236([2009]4),2009615,:(1),(2),,,,(3),:(),2003W1KipViscusi,StructuringanEffectiveOccupationalDiseasePolicy:VictimCompensationandRiskRegulation,2YaleJ1Reg1(1984),P153.,,lv,:,,,;,;,,,,,:22004200520062007(20032007)5611114(4)(4)(5)(2)(4)(1)(1)(6)(9)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(3)(4)(3)(1)(1)((20042007)(20042007))(),,,,,lw,1996,,921lvlwlu,229:3(20052007)200520062007(20052007)(),lx,,,ly,lz,:,,,,,,,l{,:,,,222,,,19816()31,,,33,,,,,,,(),,l|,[2005]603120096lxlylzl{l|,247lz,342:(2007),2008,323,,:,2007,114:,200541,,,,:([2003]12),,,l}(),,,,,:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,??(),,,,,,,,;,,,?,,,,;,,l~,(2003)261,,,,131l}l~,lz,311,243,,,,60,50,,,mu,,,,,,,,,,,mv(),,,,,,,()?,,,,:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,(),,,:,,,,,23120096mumv,[2004]96:,,??,,,;,,;,mw:11,,,,,,;,21,,,;,,,,,31,,,,,,,,,,;;mx,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,(:)331mwmx,,111[]:,,1997,511990s1BasedonthecriticismsontheAmericanclassactions,theGermanjuristsproposedaseriessystemicreformsug2gestionabouttheGermancollectivelitigationinthebeginningyearsof212centurt,someofwhichhavebeenacceptedinthecurrentlegislation1Itistoconcludethat,althoughGermanjuristscontinuouslyrejectedtointroducetheclassactionsysteminthepassed30years,thedevelopmentofGermancollectivelitigationhadbeenstronglyaffectedbytheclassac2tionsystem1FortheGermanjurists,Classactionsystemisacuriosity,aswellasaparagon1KeywordsClassAction;ConsumerProtection;MassDamages;TestLitigationWuZeyong,AssociateProfessorofHenanUniversityLawSchool.OnLegalBasisofInvestigatorTestifyinginCourtGUYongzhong120Investigatortestifyingincourthasbeenincludedinournationsnewroundreformofjusticesystem1Whileitslegalbasisisstillamatterofcontroversyintheory1Somebelievethatthewitnessstipulatedinthearticle48clauseofCriminalProceduralLawincludeinvestigator,whichisthelegalbasisforinvestigatortestifyingincourt1Othersthinkthatthewithdrawalofinvestigatorstipulatedinthearticle28clauseofCriminalProceduralLawdeniesthecompetenceofinvesti2gatoappearingincourt1Idontagreewiththeforesaidopinions1Iholdtheideathatthereislegalbasisforinvestigatorgivingevidenceincourt,thouththeprovisionisnotclearenough1Itisnecessarytoperfectthecorrelativesystemandle2galbasisoftheissueaccordingtofollowingfactors,suchasinvestigatorsstatutoryresbonsibilities,acturalneedsoftri2al,specificityofinvestigation,etc1KeywordsInvestigator;TestifyinginCourt;LegalBasisGuYongzhong,ProfessorofProceduralLawResearchInstitutionatChinaUniveristyofPoliticalScienceandLaw1JudicialReviewofAdministrativeInterpretationinSpecificArea:AnExamplefromWorkersCompensationAdministrationHUMinjie126Thespecificareahasmassiveadministrativeinterpretation1Workerscompensationadministrationisoneofrepre2sentativearea1Takingthisareaasanexample,wediscoveredthatadministrativeinterpretationshavemanyforms1Asaresultofthedifferenceoftheinterpretersandcontents,courtsmannerisnotalsosameintreatmenttoadministrativein2terpretation1Injudicialreviewofadministrativeinterpretationinspecificarea,thefollowingissuesmightbetakenintoaccount:whetherthecourtsgivedifferentattitudetoadministrativeinterpretation,thespecifiedfactorandlimitationinjudicialreviewandsoonquestions1Indeeplevel,theseproblemsarerelatedtotherelationshipofadministrativepowerandthejudicialpower1KeywordsExpertise;AdministrativeInterpretation;WorkersCompensationAdministration;JurisdictionHuMinjie,Ph1D1,AssociateProfessorofNanjingUniversityLawSchool.OnFundamentalRightsasCriteriaforInvalidJuristicActs:ReviewoftheapprovalbytheSupremeCourtontheCaseNon2liabilityforWork2relatedInjuriesin1988ZHANGHong134Asoneofthecriteriatojudgetheeffectivenessofjuristicacts,thefundamentalrightsoftheConstitutionestablishesasetofobjectivevalueordersofthewholesociety,whicharenotonlyapplicabletothestatesandpeople,butalsotoconstrainprivatelawrelationships1Constitutionisnotthelawwhichmakesjuristicactsinvalidduetotheirviolationoflaw1However,weshouldregardthosejuristicactswhichgoagainstthefundamentalrightsinvalidjustbecauseofthebreachofpublicorderandgoodcustoms1Violationofthelawandcontrarytopublicorderandgoodcustomsarereasonsofinvalidityofjuristicactsrespectively,whilethefundamentalrightsthroughthepublicorderandgoodcustomcouldin2751No.6December2009